Attempting to stay in bounds

It has been nearly a month since Colin Kaepernick was first noticed for sitting out the national anthem. Many thought that his gesture and stance would be talked about for a few days and like many other things would fade. But Kaepernick’s movement has done everything but that.


On Wednesday, the WNBA’s Indiana Fever became the first professional sports team to take on the protest. Prior to its playoff game against the Phoenix Mercury, which eventually won the game, the entire team took a knee and linked arms during the national anthem. They were even joined by two Mercury players Mistie Bass and Kelsey Bone.

This isn’t the first time that a WNBA team has spoken out either. In July, prior to Kaepernick, players for the Minnesota Lynx, New York Liberty, Fever and Mercury players wore T-shirts with messages seeking change following the deaths of Philando Castile and Alton Sterling.


The movement has gained many supporters at the high school and youth level. Unfortunately these athletes aren’t immune to the backlash that comes with being involved in such a high-profile protest.

A youth football team is receiving death threats after deciding as a team to take a knee prior to a game on Sept. 11 in Beaumont, Texas. The decision to protest was brought up by the children ages 11-12 and was supported by the coaches and parents. According to a mother whose son is on the team, online comments have said their “coaches and players should be lynched. They should have burned in 9/11. There are people who are saying the n-word.”

Some say the kids don’t know what they are kneeling for, but these kids aren’t blind to what is going on around the country.

On Tuesday, Kaepernick came out saying that he has received death threats.

“To me, if something like that were to happen, you’ve proved my point and it will be loud and clear for everyone why it happened and that would move this movement forward at a greater speed than what it is even now,” Kaepernick said. “Granted, I don’t want that to happen, but that’s the realization of what could happen, and I knew there were other things that came along with this when I first stood up and spoke about it. That’s not something I haven’t thought about.”

How is this right? You may not agree with Kaepernick’s and others motives or methods, but when is it ever OK to threaten someone’s life because of it? People making death threats to Kaepernick and anyone else who have knelt in support of him are only fueling the fire.


During a press conference Wednesday night, the Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton fielded questions regarding racial issues despite normally being hesitant. His comments came a day after the fatal shooting of Keith L. Scott in Charlotte, North Carolina, which sparked protests throughout the city.

“We all have to hold each other accountable,” Newton said. “I’m a firm believer of justice. I’m a firm believer of doing the right thing. And I can’t repeat it enough of just holding people accountable. … I am not happy with what or how the justice has been kind of dealt with over the years.”

Newton has not joined the Kaepernick movement, but he is the latest NFL player to come forward and make a statement regarding the need for change. During the press conference he asked the same question that Kaepernick did in one of his first interviews: how do police on a leave of absence still get paid?

The reigning NFL MVP has commented on social issues before and knows the backlash that often comes with it. He called the place that he stands along with many other athletes a lose-lose.


The Right to Sit

Before the Niners’ preseason game on Aug. 26 against the Green Bay Packers, Colin Kaepernick chose not to stand for the national anthem. Since then his name has been in news headlines and he is trending on Twitter.

What is the problem with choosing not to stand? The No. 1 argument is that it is disrespectful to our county, our flag and our military. But there is no law saying that U.S. citizens are required to stand when the “Star-Spangled Banner” is played. We aren’t the only country who stands when their national anthem is played. When other countries’ anthems are played, we are taught to stand out of a sign of respect. But what happens when that country isn’t respecting its citizens? Does that country still deserve a standing ovation?

Kaepernick chose not to stand for the national anthem because he believes that America isn’t living up to what it was founded on.

“Ultimately, it’s to bring awareness and make people realize what is really going on in this country,” Kaepernick said following the game. “There are a lot of things going on that is unjust, people aren’t being held accountable, and that is something that needs to change. This country stands for freedom, liberty and justice for all and that’s not happening right now.”

The main issue I’ve come to find from people who aren’t happy with Kaepernick’s stance is that it disrespects the military. Well, that’s not true. By choosing not to stand for the national anthem you are not disrespecting the U.S. military, you are exercising the very right that men and women in uniform have served and sacrificed for.

The First Amendment specifically states the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to peaceably assemble. It is this amendment and the remainder of the constitution that our military is fighting for. They fight so that we all have the right to do what Kaepernick chose to do. If you don’t believe me, check out #VeteransForKaepernick.

In his Donkey of the Day segment, Charlamagne tha God chose Kaepernick as his Aug. 29 donkey. And in that radio segment he brought up a good point, the flag represents a system and America is a business — “like any place of employment, when you promise your employees certain rights and don’t deliver, those employees have the right to speak out and demand what is promised.”

Kaepernick is demanding what the United States of America has promised ALL of its citizens because now not ALL of us are receiving those so-called promises.

Kaepernick is one of several athletes who have spoken out on the issues of police brutality and the system of racism that still exists in this country. But there is something that separates Kaepernick from the ESPY speech of Carmello Anthony, Lebron James, Dwayne Wade and Chris Paul. There is something that sets Kaepernick apart from all the rest. He is forcing you to take a side, forcing you to acknowledge that there needs to be some real change.

I think what many people need to ask themselves regarding the controversy — are you upset because he isn’t standing or are you upset with his reasoning for not standing? If the issue is solely with him not standing then, heads up, it is not an act of patriotism if we “need” to stand and if standing is the requirement you aren’t being patriotic for doing so. If your problem with Kaepernick’s stance is in regards to what he is standing for, then you are un-American for thinking that not all of America’s citizens deserve the same treatment and the same rights. If you think that all of America’s citizens receive the same treatment and the same rights, then you are blind.

In his op-ed to the Washington Post, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar voiced his support for Kaepernick and called his act highly patriotic, “What should horrify Americans is not Kaepernick’s choice to remain seated during the national anthem, but that nearly 50 years after (Muhammad) Ali was banned from boxing for his stance and Tommie Smith and John Carlos’s raised fists caused public ostracization and numerous death threats, we still need to call attention to the same racial inequities.” Ali, Smith, and Carlos are all black athletes who were once considered controversial for their protests but have since become iconic symbols of the U.S. civil rights movement.

I guess the real question is should we as a country celebrate how far we’ve come in regards to equality or continue to work toward improvement because we still have a long way to go? For me, we must continue to work on it and, because of that, I will continue to sit alongside Kaepernick on this one.


Under the Radar

Unless you are the sports fan constantly refreshing the sports news page on Google, there is probably quite a bit of information, issues and events that you are missing. If it’s something huge, I can count on social media to let me know of its happenings, but some of the most interesting stories are oftentimes left out of my news feed.


One issue that I had to do some searching for and finally found in small print on is that pressure to change the name of the Washington Redskins continues to grow, now internationally. In a letter dated Feb. 2, two members of British Parliament voiced their concern with the name of the team to the National Football League. At the minimum the letter calls for the NFL to send a different team to play in London later this year. Washington is set to play Cincinnati on Oct. 30 at Wembley Stadium.

The issue with the team name has to do with the historical derivation of the team’s mascot. England currently has the strictest anti-racism laws in sports. Clubs at every level in the county run the risk of being heavily fined or banished from their respective leagues for any deemed violations.

Here in America, more than 30 national Native American organizations have spoken out against the team name.

“Sport has the rare ability to act as a unifying force in the world, yet the use of the Washington team name is inherently divisive,” Parliament members Ruth Smeeth and Ian Austin said in the letter’s conclusion. “It is both puzzling and alarming the NFL is choosing to export this controversy to Britain.”

This backlash in regards to Washington’s name from an international community that has really started to take hold of America’s most popular sport could be the extra push the NFL and other sports leagues need to get rid of names deemed racist.


Being the huge Big Ten fan that I am, any headline that mentions the conference is an automatic read for me. On SB Nation — The Crimson Quarry, I came across an article titled, “Could ESPN’s marginalization of college basketball push the Big Ten away?”

The author of the article, Ben Raphel, discusses the topic in a two-part series. The first part is what caught my attention. He shines light on the way that members of the conference, in particular the Indiana Hoosiers, feel shafted by the so-called world-wide leader in sports.

Since my time at Michigan State University began in the fall of 2011, this conversation topic came up more times than I can count. With my fellow sport journalism majors, it felt like a daily discussion. It usually corralled around football considering the SEC gets more than its fair share of coverage. Granted it has provided the national champion the most times in recent years and sends the most players to the NFL, but college football definitely does not center on the SEC.

Currently the issue is with basketball. The funny part about this is that the SEC is not a dominant basketball conference and never really has been. But this entire season ESPN has been hanging on every little thing LSU forward Ben Simmons has done. Despite LSU being 16-12, not in the top 25 and having just experienced a loss by 20 to Arkansas, it’s surprising that the team is getting more airtime than Kobe Bryant and his farewell tour.

The SEC has two teams in the AP top 25 whereas the Big 12 is the leader with six teams and the Big Ten follows with five. And yet Kentucky gets more airtime than both because of its famous one-and-done performances.

The Big Ten’s TV contract is up after the 2016-17 season, and with the giant amounts of shade that the conference feels ESPN is throwing its way, that could lead it to look into other possibilities.

Double Standards: How my respect for Cam Newton grew while it all but disappeared for others


Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

I have never been a Cam Newton fan. I disliked him when he was at Auburn and as far as him being in the NFL, well I forgot about him for the most part until this year. As Newton and his 18-1 Carolina Panthers continued to make their run toward the Super Bowl though, I started to notice my dislike for him disappearing.

It was his attitude that at one point made me say I was not a Newton fan, but as Super Bowl week started to gear up, I found that same attitude pulling me in. I realized that it was his attitude that helped carry his team of no names through a one-loss season. It was his attitude that got his team rallying behind him. It was his attitude that made the Panthers look like they had the most fun out of any team in the league. My respect for the team from Carolina that dealt with doubters all season, myself included, hit an all-time high.

Then came the press conferences and the slew of racially charged questions that I thought the quarterback handled well. According to the media, Newton apparently was the first black quarterback to ever grace the Super Bowl stage, even though there were five prior to him.

But the string of events that turned my dislike into respect was what took place postgame, post-Carolina loss and post-postgame press conferences.

Since football came to a close Sunday night, the media is looking for ways to keep America’s favorite sport in the headlines. And the two biggest headlines this week were: “Why Newton didn’t jump on that final fumble” and “How Newton is the world’s worst loser.”

In regards to the fumble, I don’t know why he didn’t just jump on it. I’d like to think that would be my first reaction if I was a quarterback at the playing stage, but I’ll never know.

What’s really had me going all week though is people’s reaction to his postgame press conference. He left early and gave insufficient answers. He has been called a sore loser, the world’s worst loser, disrespectful, the Donald Trump of the NFL and, well, the list goes on.

On Tuesday, Newton found himself in front of the cameras once again where he said, “Who likes to lose? You show me a good loser, and I’m going to show you a loser.”

He was upset. He just suffered the biggest loss of his career. How would you react? Knowing me, I’d be pretty pissed.

Newton wasn’t fitting the quarterback mold after Sunday’s game. He wasn’t fitting the mold that Denver’s Peyton Manning so uprightly holds. At least so they say.

Newton is being called disrespectful and bitter for leaving a press conference early, but in 2010 Manning was called competitive when he ran off the field before time expired in the Colts’ 31-17 Super Bowl loss to the Saints.

Manning didn’t wait for time to expire and he didn’t shake the hands of his opponents, but according to the reporters he reacted exactly how any competitive athlete should act. He had been working all season to get there only to fall short. So what’s the difference? Why isn’t Newton getting the same understanding?

In my eyes what Manning did in 2010 was the most unsportsmanlike thing to do, and I can thank my mom for that lesson. When I was 7 years old and extremely competitive, my soccer team lost by one goal. I was beyond pissed and refused to shake the other players’ hands. My mom saw me and before the lecture, was dragging me across the field. She made me not only shake the hand of every girl but say sorry for being a sore loser. Let’s just say I learned my lesson. Clearly Archie Manning never taught Peyton Manning that one.

Find any picture of postgame celebrations and you will see Newton shaking Peyton Manning’s hand with a huge congratulatory smile on his face. If I hadn’t watched the game, I wouldn’t have been able to tell who won.

Newton gave praise where it was due on the field and then he headed to the locker room. Instead of his normal flashy outfits for pressers, he slipped on a gray hoodie and kept the hood on. What did the media want? Him flying in with his huge megawatt smile spread across his face?

Newton is only human, yet we hold him along with all professional athletes to a higher standard, they’re heroes right? Just remember that the next time you have a problem with Newton’s Superman celebration reference or Superman T-shirt.

Sunday of Quarterbacks

This Sunday is conference championships, the final step toward Super Bowl 50. It’s a Sunday of quarterbacks. We have the undeniable Hall of Famers in Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. We have Carson Palmer, who led the NFL in both yards per attempt and yards per completion through the regular season. And there is Cam Newton, the leading QB on the ground with 636 yards and 10 scores.

I’m a firm believer in the fact that the quarterback is just one of the many facets of a team, but in the case of these conference championships, the outcomes of the games will be heavily dependent on which quarterbacks show up to play.

AFC CHAMPIONSHIP, PATRIOTS AT BRONCOS: Both the Patriots and the Broncos come into the game with 12-4 season records. Denver received home field advantage due to their exciting 30-24 overtime win against New England in Week 12.

Both teams were missing key offensive assets in the Nov. 29, 2015, match on the gridiron. The Broncos played without Manning, putting Brock Osweiler under center, and the Patriots played without wide receiver Julian Edelman, who showed exactly what kind of impact he has in the divisional playoff game.

The Broncos are coming off a not-so-pretty win against an injury-heavy Pittsburg Steelers. Denver had to rely on kicker Brandon McManus to pull off the win. McManus kicked five field goals to put the Broncos over the Steelers, 23-16.

In their divisional playoff, the Patriots beat the Kansas City Chiefs by a touchdown, 27-20. After going 4-2 in the final six games of the regular season, the New England team from the first half of the season looks to be making its return. Edelman, who suffered a broken foot in Week 10, made his return against the Chiefs. He was targeted a team-high 16 times and had a team-high 10 receptions and 100 yards.

New England is the three-point favorite going into Sunday, according to Odds Shark. Sixty-seven percent of bets are being placed on the Patriots. I don’t think I can make a solid argument against either case.

This season Manning has a touchdown-interception ratio of 9-17 with only one touchdown pass at home. Brady is 36-7. The Broncos have been dealing with a shaky offense for awhile, and if it wasn’t for their No. 1 defense, I don’t think they’d even be in the postseason. Denver will need its defense to pull out all the works against New England doing everything possible to stop Brady and his support staff of Edelman, Rob Gronkowski and Danny Amendola. The Broncos look to linebackers Von Miller and DeMarcus Ware to lead the charge. Miller has a team-high 11 sacks this season, and Ware has 7.5 of his own.

While it may not be the No. 1 defense in the league, the Patriots are ninth overall in yards allowed this season, which will pose some issues for a Bronco team that already has issues getting to the red zone. One thing Denver has going for it is that Patriots linebacker Jared Mayo has been placed on injury reserve with a hurt shoulder and won’t be playing Sunday.

If New England takes the win, this will be the seventh bowl appearance for the Brady and Bill Belichick team. The Patriots are 0-3 in postseason games in Denver.

NFC CHAMPIONSHIP, CARDINALS AT PANTHERS: The Arizona Cardinals (13-3) will travel to Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, North Carolina, to take on the Carolina Panthers (15-1) in the NFC Conference championship. This will be the first meeting of the season between these two teams.

The Panthers are coming off a big 31-24 win over Seattle in the divisional playoff. Carolina had a nearly perfect — I don’t like the word perfect — first half, outscoring the Seahawks 31-0. But then the Panthers let 24 Seahawk points go unanswered in the second half. While I don’t think that is a need for alarm, it does make me wonder if Seattle could have pulled off the upset if there was just a little more time.

Although it won the NFC West with relative ease, Arizona is coming off quite the win against Green Bay. The Cardinals were winning 20-13 with less than two minutes to go. With the game on the line, Green Bay went for it on fourth and 20 with a 60-yard throw to Jeff Janis. An illegal motion put the Packers at first and 15 with 12 seconds remaining on the Cardinals’ 41-yard line.

With no other options left, Aaron Rodgers went for the Hail Mary and connected with Janis to send the game into overtime. However, OT belonged to Larry Fitzgerald, who led Arizona to the win with a 75-yard catch and run to get inside the 10-yard line, followed by a shovel pass from Palmer to reach the end zone.

Like in the AFC, the NFC championship is predicted to come down to a field goal with the Panthers being the three-point favorite, according to Odds Shark.

Newton is the leading quarterback on the ground with 636 yards rushing and 10 scores on the ground. He also threw 35 touchdown passes in the regular season. Newton’s support staff makes the Panther offense what it is. Running back Jonathan Stewart has 989 yards rushing, tight end Greg Olsen had 1,104 receiving yards with seven touch downs and wide receiver Ted Ginn has 10 touchdown catches on his 2015-16 resume. Carolina’s offense is the reason it went 15-1 this season with the only loss coming from division rival Atlanta.

Palmer was one of the top passers in the league through the regular season, leading the NFL in both yards per attempt and yards per completion, but that quarterback didn’t really show up in the divisional playoff. Palmer threw two interceptions and struggled against the defense against Green Bay.

Palmer will need to shake off the postseason nerves and be at his best if the Cardinals want to pull off the win. Palmer threw for 4,671 yards and 35 touchdowns in regular-season play.

If the Panthers win, this will be Newton’s first trip to the Super Bowl since entering the NFL in 2011.


I don’t disagree with the Patriots being the favored team in the AFC championship, but it’s going against a lot of the odds that some are using to bet against the Cardinals.

No road team has won a conference championship since 2012, the year when two road teams made it to the Super Bowl” the Baltimore Ravens and the San Francisco 49ers. Spanning the last 20 seasons, road teams are 15-25 in the conference championship.

My only argument with the odds in the AFC matchup is that I think the Patriots will win by more than three points. They have the stronger offense and a solid defense to match. New England won’t be relying on field goals to pull off this win.

The NFC championship I believe will be the more exciting of the two games. It will pit offense against offense and I look forward to seeing what these two teams are able to bring forward. I expect touchdowns to be scored and I believe the betting odds are correct: it will be a fight till the very end.



NFL loses bargaining chip?

The NFL voted Tuesday in Houston to decide which franchise would work its way back to Los Angeles. The 32 coaches in the league voted 30-2 on relocating the St. Louis Rams to the country’s second largest market that has been NFL-less for 21 years. So why now?


There are a few different ideas going around on why the Rams got the go-ahead. I’d like to think the league partially thought about the fans, but some people beg to differ. I’d like to think it was a factor, for the Rams have the longest history in the city and an active fan base there.

Moving to LA the Rams will deal with plenty of competition when trying to gain new supporters. There are the Lakers and Clippers, Dodgers and Angels, Kings and Ducks, and you can’t forget the giants of it all — USC and UCLA. It was termed the Entertainment Capital of the World for a reason.

The main reason for everything the NFL does, though, is business. That is why Rams owner Stan Kroenke’s stadium design at the Old Hollywood Park Racetrack outdid the Charger/Raider Carson proposal. The multiuse center in Inglewood will cost $1.8 billion and won’t be ready until 2019, but for the money that the NFL is hoping this place will generate, it’s worth the wait.

Until their new home is built, the Rams will most likely be playing in the Coliseum.


The Chargers were offered the option of joining the Rams either as a partner or a tenant. Owner Dean Spanos has until January 2017 to make his decision.

The main reason Spanos wants to make the move is the simple fact that San Diego has not delivered a new stadium. Qualcomm was built in 1967, and if you’ve ever been inside that place, it doesn’t look like many renovations have taken place either. But renovations won’t do this time around, and the Chargers are looking for a new home, so that means Qualcomm can’t just get gutted.

The city of San Diego is hosting a vote in June to decide on a $350 million check for the Chargers. Raiders owner Mark Davis has been calling for a new home for years now. Coliseum saw renovations in 1995 but was built in 1966. Back in 2014 Davis traveled to Houston to see if there was a possibility there for his team, but as long as Jerry Jones of the Cowboys and Bob McNair of the Texans are around, no other team is stepping into their territory.

For now the Raiders are staying in Oakland, but if the Chargers choose to stay in San Diego, Davis will then get a year to decide if he wants to make the move or not. Entering a market three years after the other team though sounds lethal to me.

Additionally, the NFL has offered $100 million to assist with solutions in current markets if both teams choose to remain.


Los Angeles has been the NFL’s biggest bargaining chip since both the Rams and Raiders left the city following the 1994 season. Each team left for a smaller market thinking it would be better.

But since 1994, 22 of the league’s 32 teams have upgraded their stadiums. All a city needed to hear was, “Well we can always move to LA,” and the money came rolling out. Washington delivered $300 million to keep the Seahawks in 1997, and the Vikings recently got $498 million for a new stadium in downtown Minneapolis.

This will be the NFL’s first relocation since 1997, and let’s face it, they don’t want two teams in LA. If the NFL has its way, this move will bring out new stadiums for three more of the teams.

Football Roundup

In the world of football, it was just another week. The College Football Playoff committee released another set of rankings — but again, it’s entirely meaningless until Dec. 6. And we just finished celebrating Thanksgiving, or as I like to say, “Turkey and Football Day,” but the game outcomes aren’t going to make a tremendous difference, at least at this point in the season.


The NFL has remained pretty uneventful in 2015. It’s the teams at the bottom that have created the most excitement and it’s because we are all looking to see who could be the team to knock New England or Carolina off the high horse.

The Panthers dominated their Thanksgiving game against a struggling Dallas Cowboys team that has been looking all season to make a comeback. Dallas thought that if it could take down the undefeated Panthers, playoff hopes would be reunited. But if a win were at all possible, the Cowboys knew they needed quarterback Tony Romo.

Romo returned last week to pull off a not very impressive win, but a win nonetheless against Miami. The starting QB missed seven games after suffering a collarbone break against the Eagles on Sept. 20.

Thanksgiving wasn’t all so giving to the face of the Cowboy franchise; Romo went down and stayed down following a sack by the Panthers. It has been reported that he will miss the remainder of the season, so Cowboy fans, if you haven’t already done so, say so long to the playoffs.

The only game that was exciting on turkey day was the Chicago Bears vs. the Green Bay Packers. The Packers were definitely the favorite going into the game, but I can’t say I’m all that surprised by the Bears’ 17-13 win. Since the Packers fell to the Broncos on Nov. 1, Green Bay has won one of five games.

After Week 5 of NFL play, this season was turning out to be pretty interesting. We had five undefeated teams. But after Week 6 there were only four, and now we are left with two.

Following the top tier we had six teams with 3-3 records, which although being subpar were second tier considering there were 18 teams with losing seasons by Week 5. The average in years past was 13.5.

Since Nov. 1, the league’s second-tier teams look much better than 3-3, with 8-2 and 7-3 records. The third tier are no longer the teams playing losing football, but we can’t exactly say they are playing winning football either.

The game to watch this weekend is New England at Denver. Can the Broncos be the ones to pull off the upset? The remainder of games should either be complete blowouts or have the ability to shake up the middle of the pack.


College football definitely has all my attention right now. In Week 10 we went from 11 undefeated teams to Week 13 where only two are left standing, Clemson, No. 1, and Iowa, No. 3. Every week has been exciting with big wins and big losses, and in the last three weeks we have seen such an array of different teams in the top 10, I’m on the edge of my seat to see what goes on this weekend.

We have five matchups between top-25 opponents with four having strong promise to spark great change in the top 10 once again. The conference with the most on the line this week is the Big 12.

This weekend brings on state rivalries for the Big 12. Baylor, No. 7, at TCU, No. 19, kicks off first, and on Saturday No. 3 Oklahoma at No. 11 Oklahoma State will meet.

Baylor is the favored team in the Texas state matchup, but TCU almost pulled off an upset at Oklahoma last week, 30-29. If the Bears beat the Horned Frogs, they have a chance at moving up in the College Football Playoff rankings, but they are heavily dependent on those ahead of them to secure a playoff spot. Because the Big 12 doesn’t have a conference championship, Baylor has one more regular season game next week, against a Texas team that has not brought much to the table this season other than a win over the Sooners.

Oklahoma is the Big 12’s best chance at not being snubbed by the CFP committee for the second year in a row. Following their one-point win over the Horned Frogs, the Sooners jumped from No. 7 to No. 3. However, the 10-1 Sooners need a win at the 10-1 Cowboys to remain in playoff conversation. The Cowboys fell to Baylor 45-35 on Nov. 21. Prior to the game the Cowboys were the only undefeated team left in the conference. If Oklahoma State wins, it has a good argument to make the playoffs, especially if Baylor wins as well.

The Notre Dame at Stanford game also has the ability to cause some distress in the top 10. No. 6 Notre Dame is trying to make a claim for the playoffs but without a win over No. 9 Stanford that all but goes down the drain. The Pacific-12 has lost all playoff hopes with its conference champion most likely being a two-loss team.

After falling 17-14 to the Michigan State Spartans, No. 5, the Ohio State Buckeyes, No. 8, are out of the playoff conversation. The Buckeyes head to the Big House with hopes to take down the Michigan Wolverines, No. 10. Urban Meyer and his defending national champions need the win in order to stay in the top 10 and prove that they are still worth talking about. If the Wolverines pull off the win, the Jim-Harbaugh-is-Michigan’s-savior train will ride straight into next season.

Iowa headed to Lincoln, Nebraska, on Friday to take on the unranked Cornhuskers. Nebraska’s biggest game this season was their win over the Spartans on Nov. 7. Other than that the Cornhuskers had been struggling to get something going all season.

Though Lincoln is known as one of the hardest places to play in the Big 10 and it knew it could deliver the upset following a win over MSU, Iowa still won 28-20.

The Hawkeyes were already the Big 10 West champion having secured their conference championship bid a few weeks back. They most likely be playing Michigan State on Dec. 4.

No. 2 Alabama plays Auburn and No. 1 Clemson plays South Carolina. The top two teams in the NCAA are predicted to win, but in sports we all know that on any given day, any team can win. So pull out your chips and dip and get comfortable. We have two more weeks of college football that are bound to be action-packed.